Federal AI preemption: ask what replaces the state rule
Updated 17 October 2026. Preemption debates are about who may make rules and what replaces them. A claim that a proposal will create clarity needs to explain the…
The writing archive
AI
I write about AI agents, governance and product decisions. Usually because a question won’t leave me alone. Have a different take? I’d like to hear it.
33 essays & field notes33 articles
Voluntary AI governance needs evidence of participation
Updated 17 October 2026. “Voluntary” describes participation. It does not, by itself, tell you whether a programme produces useful evidence. The harder question is what participants provide and…
EU AI Act compliance 2026: are enterprises really ready?
Updated 17 October 2026. Readiness is a claim about a particular system and its evidence. It is not a percentage printed beside a green traffic light.Earlier versions of…
AI governance starts with an inventory you can actually use
Updated 17 October 2026. Before asking whether an AI system is ready for a regulatory deadline, ask whether the organisation can find it. An inventory is basic work.…
An AI deregulation headline does not settle your obligations
Updated 17 October 2026. A political signal is not a deployment assessment. “Deregulation” can describe an administration’s direction without answering what a particular organisation must do with a…
The voluntary AI governance gamble is follow-through
Updated 17 October 2026. The gamble in voluntary governance is not simply that somebody can decline to participate. It is that a serious finding may have no clear…
AI harm needs an investigation, not a blame shortcut
Updated 17 October 2026. Who should investigate, who should help the affected person and who may be legally liable are different questions. Collapsing them into a single blame…
AI accountability needs a maintained legal register
Updated 17 October 2026. Earlier versions of this article discussed Colorado’s changes as a pending delay. The legislature now records SB26-189 as enacted. A legal register needs to…
AI policy coordination should preserve a route to remedy
Updated 17 October 2026. Coordinating AI rules can be useful. The test is whether a person affected by a consequential decision still has somewhere effective to take the…
Sovereign AI procurement needs an exit test
Updated 17 October 2026. A service can be local and still be difficult to leave. Exit is therefore a useful sovereignty question: what can the organisation take with…
AI accountability must survive the prioritisation meeting
Updated 17 October 2026. It is easy to agree that accountability matters. The interesting decision arrives when the work competes with a feature somebody can demonstrate on Friday.Make…
AI Act simplification: check the control, not the label
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
AI governance needs an owner, not another deadline
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Colorado AI rules: documentation still has work to do
Updated 17 October 2026. Colorado’s 2026 changes should not be described as the disappearance of developer accountability. That earlier framing was too broad. The enacted SB26-189 includes technical…
A model evaluation is not a deployment evaluation
Updated 17 October 2026. Testing a model can reveal important capabilities and failures. It does not automatically establish what a particular product built around that model will do.Evaluate…
Turn AI governance into a control backlog
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
A later AI Act deadline is a budget decision
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Stop mixing legal uncertainty with unfinished product decisions
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
How to track AI regulatory changes without losing the plot
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
When AI capabilities change, revisit the threat model
Updated 17 October 2026. A more capable model can change the risk of a workflow without changing its interface. The product still looks familiar. The assumptions underneath it…
AI governance belongs in the release process
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
How to assess an AI policy proposal
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Prepare AI governance evidence for procurement
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Compare AI protections before and after a policy change
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Collect AI evidence before the deadline scramble
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Deferring AI governance work is a decision
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
AI governance for small product teams
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Make AI governance an operating routine
Updated 17 October 2026. A governance framework becomes operational when it changes what people do on an ordinary working day. A document launch is not the same milestone.Put…
Reuse AI frameworks, not unexamined conclusions
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Answer the AI assurance question your customer asked
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Make AI risk classification reviewable
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Prepare AI evidence for scrutiny
Updated 17 October 2026. This article has been revised to separate the policy timeline from the product argument. See the current AI Act timeline for the category-specific dates…
Light-touch AI governance still needs a clear boundary
Updated 17 October 2026. A light-touch process can be appropriate for a limited use. An undefined boundary cannot. The useful question is whether the process matches the consequences…
No essays match that search. Try another word or choose All.
In conversation
Shorter thoughts.
Longer conversations.
Some thoughts start as a post. The replies often make them more interesting. You’ll find those conversations on LinkedIn.
Read my posts ↗Customer-centricity; Products and Cultures ↗